[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070630104038.GB24123@infradead.org>
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 11:40:38 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>, Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/3] add the fsblock layer
On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 08:26:50AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> Since we're testing new code, I would just leave the blkdev address
> space alone. If a filesystem wants to use fsblocks, they allocate a new
> inode during mount, stuff it into their private super block (or in the
> generic super), and use that for everything. Basically ignoring the
> block device address space completely.
Exactly, same thing XFS does.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists