[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070630112558.GA230@tv-sign.ru>
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 15:25:58 +0400
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
To: Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, matthew@....cx
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] Convert all tasklets to workqueues
On 06/29, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> Suppose we have the tasklets T1 and T2, both are scheduled on the
> same CPU. T1 takes some spinlock LOCK.
>
> Currently it is possible to do
>
> spin_lock(LOCK);
> disable_tasklet(T2);
>
> With this patch, the above code hangs.
I am stupid. Yes, flush_workqueue() is evil and should not be used, but
if we use workqueues, tasklet_disable() becomes might_sleep() anyway.
This is incompatible and unavoidable change.
grep, grep...
net/bluetooth/hci_core.c:hci_rx_task()
read_lock(&hci_task_lock)
hci_event_packet()
hci_num_comp_pkts_evt()
tasklet_disable(&hdev->tx_task)
Oleg.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists