[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1183360046.12198.8.camel@localhost>
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2007 09:07:26 +0200
From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [patch 5/5] Optimize page_mkclean_one
On Sun, 2007-07-01 at 15:27 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > But I could easily be overlooking something: Peter will recall.
>
> /me tries to get his brain up to speed after the OLS closing party :-)
Oh-oh, the Black Thorn party :-)
> I did both pte_dirty and pte_write because I was extra careful. One
> _should_ imply the other, but since we'll be clearing both, I thought it
> prudent to also check both.
Just ran a little experiment: I've added a simple WARN_ON(ret == 0) to
page_mkclean after the page_test_dirty() check to see if there are cases
where the page is dirty and all ptes are read-only. A little stress run
including massive swap did not print a single warning.
> I will have to think on this a little more, but I'm currently of the
> opinion that the optimisation is not correct. But I'll have a thorough
> look at s390 again when I get home.
I think the patch is correct, although I beginning to doubt that is has
any effect.
--
blue skies,
Martin.
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists