[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070702075226.GB1639@ff.dom.local>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 09:52:26 +0200
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...pl>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"David S\. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] Re: [NETPOLL] netconsole: fix soft lockup when removing module
>From my recent patch:
> > #1
> > Until kernel ver. 2.6.21 (including) cancel_rearming_delayed_work()
> > required a work function should always (unconditionally) rearm with
> > delay > 0 - otherwise it would endlessly loop. This patch replaces
> > this function with cancel_delayed_work(). Later kernel versions don't
> > require this, so here it's only for uniformity.
But Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru> found:
> But 2.6.22 doesn't need this change, why it was merged?
>
> In fact, I suspect this change adds a race,
...
His description was right (thanks), so this patch reverts #1.
Signed-off-by: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...pl>
---
diff -Nurp 2.6.22-rc7-/net/core/netpoll.c 2.6.22-rc7/net/core/netpoll.c
--- 2.6.22-rc7-/net/core/netpoll.c 2007-07-02 09:03:27.000000000 +0200
+++ 2.6.22-rc7/net/core/netpoll.c 2007-07-02 09:32:34.000000000 +0200
@@ -72,8 +72,7 @@ static void queue_process(struct work_st
netif_tx_unlock(dev);
local_irq_restore(flags);
- if (atomic_read(&npinfo->refcnt))
- schedule_delayed_work(&npinfo->tx_work, HZ/10);
+ schedule_delayed_work(&npinfo->tx_work, HZ/10);
return;
}
netif_tx_unlock(dev);
@@ -786,7 +785,7 @@ void netpoll_cleanup(struct netpoll *np)
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&npinfo->refcnt)) {
skb_queue_purge(&npinfo->arp_tx);
skb_queue_purge(&npinfo->txq);
- cancel_delayed_work(&npinfo->tx_work);
+ cancel_rearming_delayed_work(&npinfo->tx_work);
flush_scheduled_work();
/* clean after last, unfinished work */
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists