linux-kernel - Re: ppdev - libieee1284.so conflicts with 2.6.21

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20070702161220.0b151a28.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date:	Mon, 2 Jul 2007 16:12:20 -0700
From:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Juan Antonio Martinez <jonsito@...eline.es>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ppdev - libieee1284.so  conflicts with 2.6.21

On Mon, 2 Jul 2007 15:47:53 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote:

> On Mon, 02 Jul 2007 11:22:09 +0200
> Juan Antonio Martinez <jonsito@...eline.es> wrote:
> 
> > I've reported this error to Fedora Bugzilla:
> > 
> > http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246406
> > 
> > In sort: to use libieee1284 I need to disable ppdev usage with
> > kernel 2.6.21. Kernel 2.6.20 works fine
> > 
> > [root@...ke char]# uname -a
> > Linux drake.micasa.es 2.6.21-1.3228.fc7 #1 SMP Tue Jun 12 15:37:31 EDT
> > 2007 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux
> > 
> > By doing "echo disallow method ppdev > /etc/ieee1284.conf" everything
> > works fine on both kernels
> > 
> > Seems affect several distributions, not Fedora specific:
> > http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/7438
> > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1739643&group_id=29314&atid=395778
> > http://www.digipedia.pl/man/libieee1284.3.html
> > 
> > Not sure if a kernel bug or a library one, so my apologizes if
> > this is not the propper list
> > 
> 
> Not much has changed in ppdev.c.  Possibly this:
> 
> commit da6752964290567a6b4ea180d1becda75e810e87
> Author: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
> Date:   Tue May 8 00:27:42 2007 -0700
> 
>     layered parport code uses parport->dev
>     
>     Update some of the layered parport_driver code to use parport->dev:
>     
>         - i2c-parport (parent of i2c_adapter)
>         - spi_butterfly (parent of spi_master, allowing cruft removal)
>         - lp (creating class_device)
>         - ppdev (parent of parportN device)
>         - tipar (creating class_device)
>     
>     There are still drivers that should be updated, like some of the input
>     drivers; but they won't be any worse off than they are today.
> 
> broke something.
> 
> Can you test a kernel with this change applied?
> 
> --- a/drivers/char/ppdev.c~a
> +++ a/drivers/char/ppdev.c
> @@ -751,7 +751,7 @@ static const struct file_operations pp_f
>  
>  static void pp_attach(struct parport *port)
>  {
> -	device_create(ppdev_class, port->dev, MKDEV(PP_MAJOR, port->number),
> +	device_create(ppdev_class, NULL, MKDEV(PP_MAJOR, port->number),
>  			"parport%d", port->number);
>  }
>  
> _


and if that doesn't help, please try this:

boot with kernel boot options:
noisapnp pnpacpi=off

since we have also seen a couple of cases that look like ACPI + PNP
are mucking up parallel port printers, so maybe they also muck up
other ppdevs.


---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/