[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b647ffbd0707020601r774a38d4gb62b6c07f1b5db32@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 15:01:37 +0200
From: "Dmitry Adamushko" <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com>
To: "Vegard Nossum" <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Linux Kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v18
On 02/07/07, Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 6/23/07, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> > i'm pleased to announce release -v18 of the CFS scheduler patchset.
>
> > As usual, any sort of feedback, bugreport, fix and suggestion is more
> > than welcome!
>
> I have been running cfs-v18 for a couple of days now, and today I
> stumbled upon a rather strange problem. Consider the following short
> program:
>
> while(1)
> printf("%ld\r", 1000 * clock() / CLOCKS_PER_SEC);
Is it running with a default (0) nice value?
could you please run the following script when your application is running?
As you have pointed out :
"... In fact, it seems that the longer it runs, the longer it takes to
terminate (towards 5 seconds after running for a couple of minutes
..." ,
please run the script a few times : say, before starting up your
application, 10 sec. after it's got started, 1 minute, a few minute...
http://people.redhat.com/mingo/cfs-scheduler/tools/cfs-debug-info.sh
then send us the resulting files. TIA,
--
Best regards,
Dmitry Adamushko
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists