linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][RFC] Remove support for the orphaned, obsolete Digi EPCA driver.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707020945290.18113@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Mon, 2 Jul 2007 09:48:35 -0400 (EDT)
From:	"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	eng.linux@...i.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] Remove support for the orphaned, obsolete Digi EPCA
 driver.

On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, Alan Cox wrote:

> On Mon, 2 Jul 2007 09:14:24 -0400 (EDT)
> "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@...dspring.com>
> >
> > ---
> >
> >   everything indicates that this driver is thoroughly dead.  the
> > MAINTAINERS file describes it as "Orphaned", while the file
> > Documentation/digiepca.txt reads:
>
> NAK
>
> > "NOTE:  This driver is obsolete.  Digi provides a 2.6 driver (dgdm) at
> > http://www.digi.com for PCI cards.  They no longer maintain this driver,
> > and have no 2.6 driver for ISA cards.
>
> This driver is obsolete from the kernel at the point the new digi drivers
> are merged.
>
> > This driver requires a number of user-space tools.  They can be acquired from
> > http://www.digi.com, but only works with 2.4 kernels."
>
> So fix them or merge the newer digi drivers first.

ok, but what then does it mean to read that this driver:

1) *requires* a number of user-space tools, and
2) these tools don't work with the 2.6 kernel?

how then does this driver have any value under 2.6 if it requires
user-space support that doesn't exist for 2.6?

obviously, i'll withdraw the patch, but it's still a mystery to me how
that driver can have any value under a 2.6 kernel, just based on
what's written above.

rday
-- 
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
========================================================================
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/