[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200707031350.01111.oliver@neukum.org>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 13:50:00 +0200
From: Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, nigel@...el.suspend2.net,
mjg59@...f.ucam.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
Am Dienstag, 3. Juli 2007 schrieb Benjamin Herrenschmidt:
> On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 13:27 +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > > You are talking about hibernate, right? Suspending (to ram) is
> > > instantaneous, in that _after_ suspend no CPU is active obviously.
> >
> > If that is so, why do you care? If it is really atomic, fuse has no
> > chance
> > to call out to its component in user space either. Removing the
> > freezer
> > cannot make a difference.
>
> It's not atomic. You will get called after suspend() in drivers. The
> thing is ... you just have to deal with it :-)
So you are volunteering to go through all drivers >:-> ?
Regards
Oliver
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists