[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200707031519.59661.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 15:19:58 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...el.suspend2.net>,
Uli Luckas <u.luckas@...d.de>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] PM: Prevent frozen user mode helpers from failing the freezing of tasks (rev. 2)
On Tuesday, 3 July 2007 07:30, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-06-26 at 00:27 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > case PM_HIBERNATION_PREPARE:
> > > > case PM_SUSPEND_PREPARE:
> > > > usermodehelper_disabled = 1;
> > > > - return NOTIFY_OK;
> > > > + smp_mb();
> > >
> > > usermodehelper_disabled should be atomic variable, too, so we don't
> > > have to play these ugly tricks by hand? This should not be
> > > performance-critical, right?
> >
> > Well, I think we'd need to add the barriers anyway.
> >
> > The problem, as far as I understand it, is that the instructions can
> > get
> > reordered if there are no barriers in there.
>
> That seems dodgy either way to me :-)
>
> Just use a spinlock.
Around wait_for_completion()? I don't think that's a good idea. :-)
Greetings,
Rafael
--
"Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists