[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070703052856.GA1657@ff.dom.local>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 07:28:56 +0200
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...pl>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] rename cancel_rearming_delayed_work() to cancel_delayed_work_sync()
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 07:36:29PM +0400, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Imho, the current naming of cancel_xxx workqueue functions is very confusing.
>
> cancel_delayed_work()
> cancel_rearming_delayed_work()
> cancel_rearming_delayed_workqueue() // obsolete
>
> cancel_work_sync()
>
> This looks as if the first 2 functions differ in "type" of their argument which
> is not true any longer, nowadays the difference is the behaviour.
>
> The semantics of cancel_rearming_delayed_work(dwork) was changed significantly,
> it doesn't require that dwork rearms itself, and cancels dwork synchronously.
>
> Rename it to cancel_delayed_work_sync(). This matches cancel_delayed_work() and
> cancel_work_sync(). Re-create cancel_rearming_delayed_work() as a simple inline
> obsolete wrapper, like cancel_rearming_delayed_workqueue().
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
Acked-by: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...pl>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists