[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0707031553020.7671-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 15:54:55 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM
pathway
On Tue, 3 Jul 2007, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > I agree that in general the suspend process should not have to wait for
> > a userspace callback to complete. Indeed, there's no particular
> > reason that anything running during STR should have to wait for
> > something in userspace to complete. Given that fact, I don't see
> > anything wrong with freezing userspace when doing STR.
>
> There's nothing wrong with it as such, it's just that our implementation
> appears to suck in a myriad of small ways that keep cropping up and
> biting people. Even without the sys_sync(), freezing processes results
> in the suspend failing because syslog is stuck in D state and won't go
> into the refrigerator.
Okay, I can believe that. The proper response then is to fix the
freezer, not eliminate it. Has the syslog problem been reported on
linux-pm? I don't recall hearing of it before.
Alan Stern
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists