[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070703053744.GB1657@ff.dom.local>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 07:37:44 +0200
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...pl>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] make cancel_xxx_work_sync() return a boolean
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 07:37:10PM +0400, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Change cancel_work_sync() and cancel_delayed_work_sync() to return a boolean
> indicating whether the work was actually cancelled. A zero return value means
> that the work was not pending/queued.
>
> Without that kind of change it is not possible to avoid flush_workqueue()
> sometimes, see the next patch as an example.
>
> Also, this patch unifies both functions and kills the (unlikely) busy-wait loop.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
Acked-by: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...pl>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists