[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1183498518.3388.12.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2007 07:35:18 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...el.suspend2.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
> I don't think that would matter.
>
> Still, I can remove the sync from the suspend code path only, leaving it in
> the hibernation code path. The patch will be bigger, but well.
>
> Any objection to that?
Makes sense to sync before suspend tho, to limit the amount of dirty
non-written pages in case things go wrong.
Ben.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists