[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fb249edb0707040500o42e945afr9040cbd268942555@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 14:00:58 +0200
From: "andrzej zaborowski" <balrogg@...il.com>
To: "Russell King - ARM Linux" <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: Don't miss the ARM-scsi fix.
On 03/07/07, Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 12:21:45PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Tue, 3 Jul 2007 15:03:56 -0400
> > Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net> wrote:
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-versatile/pci.c b/arch/arm/mach-versatile/pci.c
> > > index ba58223..ca82901 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-versatile/pci.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-versatile/pci.c
> > > @@ -117,7 +117,10 @@ static int versatile_read_config(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn, int wh
> > > } else {
> > > switch (size) {
> > > case 1:
> > > - v = __raw_readb(addr);
> > > + v = __raw_readl(addr);
> > > + if (where & 2) v >>= 16;
> > > + if (where & 1) v >>= 8;
> >
> > Someone's enter key broke?
>
> Probably, but I'd rather have the fix in than worry about that at this
> stage.
It's just the case of being consistent with the already broken style
in a function vs. correct style and inconsistency. I can never decide.
Regards,
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists