[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200707041640.12832.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 16:40:12 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
On Wednesday, 4 July 2007 14:41, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 01:25:55PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > Don't know what exactly?
> >
> > How many drivers will be adversely affected by the $subject change.
>
> Ok, so how about a CONFIG option which removes the freezer, so we can
> find out experimentally how many people without it? We can make it be
> experimental at first, or (my preference) make it be the default
> initially, and if people complain that their laptop's suspend feature
> is broken, we can tell them how to turn back on the
> CONFIG_FREEZER_DEPRECATED option.
The freezer is generally still necessary for hibernation, so I won't call
it "DEPRECATED'.
Moreover, I'd prefer to make drivers use different callbacks for hibernation
and suspend before we do that.
Greetings,
Rafael
--
"Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists