[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86802c440707041000m1378823dwff25ace3e93e54fe@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 10:00:29 -0700
From: "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
To: "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@...radead.org>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Yinghai Lu" <Yinghai.Lu@....com>, "Andi Kleen" <ak@...e.de>,
"Greg KH" <greg@...ah.com>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] net: make net and forcedeth to use kmalloc_node
On 7/4/07, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 11:58:40AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > >
> > > while (np->put_rx.orig != less_rx) {
> > > - struct sk_buff *skb = dev_alloc_skb(np->rx_buf_sz + NV_RX_ALLOC_PAD);
> > > + struct sk_buff *skb = dev_alloc_skb_node(np->rx_buf_sz + NV_RX_ALLOC_PAD, dev_to_node(&dev->dev));
> >
> > If we're going to do this then it would probably make sense to change
> > dev_alloc_skb_node() so that it takes a `struct net_device *' rather than a
> > bare node-id. That's a call which the net guys will need to make, which is
> > why we cc them on our emails.
>
> That thing is called netdev_alloc_skb and already exists. And it's indeed
> what they should be using in the rx path.
>
> -
please check
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/7/3/418
[PATCH 3/4] net: make forcedeth to use kmalloc_node and
__netdev_alloc_skb for skb allocation
but need to replace __netdev_alloc_skb to netdev_alloc_skb.
YH
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists