[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <18059.23015.860618.268754@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 18:27:19 +1000
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
To: Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
Cc: linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
Oliver Neukum writes:
> > Indeed, and the USB framework has code to know when the host
> > controller is suspended and avoid trying to send out urbs in that
> > case. Or at least it did last time I looked at it in any detail; it's
> > been "just working" - including suspending and resuming, without the
> > freezer - for quite a while now.
>
> And what happens to that IO? I suspended and lost data is not an
> acceptable behavior.
It's not lost, it's sitting in RAM, and will be sent out when you
resume.
Paul.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists