linux-kernel - Re: sata_sil, writing bug with multiple cards?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 4 Jul 2007 10:38:57 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To:	7091@...rgh.com
Cc:	Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
	jgarzik@...ox.com,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: sata_sil, writing bug with multiple cards?

On Wednesday 04 July 2007 10:17:34 7091@...rgh.com wrote:

> > Most likely it is some sort of hardware bug that we might
> > not be able to do much about. Have you tried contacting SIL or VIA? 
> 
> No, I haven't.  Like I mentioned above, the OpenBSD drivers seemed to work, 
> or at least did with similar tests.  I would need to run the more extensive 
> checks to be positive, but those take a lot of time, obviously.  And 
> downtime for the box, a lot of which isn't really manageable, at the moment. 

Perhaps the OpenBSD drivers program the SIL chip in a different way
that avoids this problem. 

> 
> > e.g. if you have some other system with a different chipset it might
> > be useful to test the SIL controllers in those.
> 
> The previous motherboard was an AMD 760 chipset, and it had the same 
> problem. 

Ok this means it's likely a SIL issue, not a chipset issue.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/