[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200707051451.38497.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 14:51:37 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>, mjg59@...f.ucam.org,
Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
On Thursday, 5 July 2007 02:36, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Alan Stern writes:
>
> > Remember what I wrote a few minutes ago about khubd and ksuspend_usbd
> > wanting to resume devices during a system suspend transition? This is
> > exactly what happens when those threads aren't frozen.
>
> So, I wonder why I don't see that error on my powerbook?
Because you have only one CPU running while your suspend code is being
executed?
Greetings,
Rafael
--
"Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists