| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <200707051602.19042.rjw@sisk.pl> Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 16:02:17 +0200 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> To: Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org> Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>, paulus@...ba.org, stern@...land.harvard.edu, johannes@...solutions.net, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pavel@....cz, mjg59@...f.ucam.org, benh@...nel.crashing.org Subject: Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway On Thursday, 5 July 2007 15:28, Oliver Neukum wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 5. Juli 2007 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki: > > > It seems pretty clear cut. Whining about how much problems this will > > > cause won't get us nearer to a solution. > > > > Yes, that's pretty clear cut, but we should start from fixing the drivers. :-) > > If, at a minimum, we can determine that we can STD without a freezer. No, we can't. > It makes no sense to invest a lot of work to face the same problem > again with STD. Arguably, it does make sense, because for many platforms the hibernation is irrelevant and we're going to separate the suspend and hibernation frameworks anyway. Greetings, Rafael -- "Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists