[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200707051609.25887.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 16:09:24 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
Cc: Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>, paulus@...ba.org,
stern@...land.harvard.edu, johannes@...solutions.net,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
pavel@....cz, benh@...nel.crashing.org
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
On Thursday, 5 July 2007 15:46, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 03:28:33PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
>
> > If, at a minimum, we can determine that we can STD without a freezer.
> > It makes no sense to invest a lot of work to face the same problem
> > again with STD.
>
> I have a model for STD that avoids the need to freeze the entirity of
> userspace, but I need to find some more time to flesh it out.
You can just describe it, as far as I'm concerned. :-)
Greetings,
Rafael
--
"Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists