[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0707051013170.3728-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 10:14:14 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
<linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] The big suspend mess
On Thu, 5 Jul 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> IMHO the suspend code is currently way too much of a moving target which
> results in this mess.
>
> The correct order seems to be:
> 1. agree on what the suspend code as a whole should look like
> 2. implement this
> 3. fix ALL drivers to work at least as good as they do today
> 4. get it tested in -mm
> 5. fix all bugs people run into
> 6. submit it for inclusion in Linus' tree
> 7. quickly work on the most likely big amount of bug reports
>
> Step 1 is the most important one - evolving code is often something
> good, but in this case with different people trying to evolve the
> suspend code in different directions it simply results in a big mess.
Isn't Step 1 exactly what we are in the midst of right now?
Alan Stern
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists