[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200707051628.12199.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 16:28:11 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: removing refrigerator does not help with s2ram vs. fuse deadlocks (was Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway)
On Thursday, 5 July 2007 15:57, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 11:15:26AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> > Now, if kernel needs FUSE services for some reason (that's the problem
> > we hit in s2ram case, right?), we have a deadlock.
> >
> > So main problem still seems to be "kernel should not depend on
> > userland services during suspend", refrigerator or not.
>
> And also "Userland should not depend on userland services", which is
> rather more of a problem.
I think you're oversimplifying it, as far as FUSE is concerned.
Namely, if there are two userland tasks, A and B, and B is uninterruptible,
because A is blocked, then this is not a usual situation.
Greetings,
Rafael
--
"Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists