[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070705125427.9a3b8e8b.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 12:54:27 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
Cc: "linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"tony.luck@...el.com" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>, Mike.stroya@...com,
GOTO <y-goto@...fujitsu.com>, dmosberger@...il.com,
hugh@...itas.com
Subject: Re: [BUGFIX][PATCH] DO flush icache before set_pte() on ia64.
On Thu, 05 Jul 2007 13:19:41 +1000
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au> wrote:
> >> From what I can work out, it is something like "at this point the page
> >>should be uptodate, so at least the icache won't contain *inconsistent*
> >>data, just old data which userspace should take care of flushing if it
> >>modifies". Is that always true?
> >
> >
> > I think it's true. But, in this case, i-cache doesn't contain *incositent* data.
> > There are inconsistency between L2-Dcache and L3-mixed-cache. At L2-icache-miss,
> > a cpu fetches data from L3 cache.
> > This case seems defficult to be generalized...
>
> If there is something in the icache line that isn't the last data to
> be stored at that address, isn't that inconsistent?
>
Hmm..do we have a chance to add do_flush_cache_if_not_filled_by_dma(page)
before SetPageUptodate(page) ?
-Kame
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists