[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200707051747.09611.vapier@gentoo.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 17:47:08 -0400
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>
To: Nix <nix@...eri.org.uk>
Cc: 7eggert@....de, Karel Zak <kzak@...hat.com>,
List util-linux-ng <util-linux-ng@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] util-linux-ng 2.13-rc1
On Thursday 05 July 2007, Nix wrote:
> On 5 Jul 2007, Mike Frysinger outgrape:
> > On Thursday 05 July 2007, Bodo Eggert wrote:
> >> The Makefiles generated by autotools is a huge mess, if autotools got it
> >> wrong (again!), fixing them requires editing a lot of files.
> >
> > this looks like a no brainer to me: dont edit generated files
>
> There is a worthwhile point here: if your input to the makefile
> generator is buggy and make errors out, you'll have to look at the
> generated code in order to relate the make error to the original.
granted, this can be a pain (ive spent an annoying amount of time tracking
down unbalanced quotes/parens/etc... by trying to correlate configure.ac with
configure), but i dont feel like this is a autotool-specific issue as it can
come up with other auto-build-generators as well. heck, a minor typo in a
hand written makefile can sometimes be a time sink and hard to trace back
(just look at linux kernel makefiles).
-mike
Download attachment "signature.asc " of type "application/pgp-signature" (828 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists