| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 02:27:47 +0200 From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: The big suspend mess > IMHO the suspend code is currently way too much of a moving target which > results in this mess. > > The correct order seems to be: 0. Get someone to sign up as a maintainer for suspend, so we have someone to blame for the mess? :-) > 1. agree on what the suspend code as a whole should look like > 2. implement this > 3. fix ALL drivers to work at least as good as they do today > 4. get it tested in -mm > 5. fix all bugs people run into > 6. submit it for inclusion in Linus' tree > 7. quickly work on the most likely big amount of bug reports > > Step 1 is the most important one - evolving code is often something > good, but in this case with different people trying to evolve the > suspend code in different directions it simply results in a big mess. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists