[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1I6jlB-0003TC-00@dorka.pomaz.szeredi.hu>
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2007 11:05:53 +0200
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: benh@...nel.crashing.org
CC: miklos@...redi.hu, nigel@...pend2.net, rjw@...k.pl, pavel@....cz,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mjg59@...f.ucam.org, oliver@...kum.org, paulus@...ba.org,
mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH -mm] PM: Do not sync filesystems from within the
freezer
> On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 09:13 +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> >
> > Another myth, that has been debunked already. The problem is: how do
> > you define fuse processes? There's no theoretical or even practial
> > way to do that.
>
> It could if they told the kernel via some black magic ...
>
> But that still suck. The freezer sucks :-)
Yeah, and it wouldn't work in practice, since the auxilary tasks might
be part of a library which is not even aware of being used by a "fuse
task".
Miklos
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists