[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1I6kC8-0003af-00@dorka.pomaz.szeredi.hu>
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2007 11:33:44 +0200
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: nigel@...el.suspend2.net
CC: miklos@...redi.hu, oliver@...kum.org, rjw@...k.pl,
nigel@...pend2.net, pavel@....cz, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
mjg59@...f.ucam.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
> > VM induced deadlocks are real nasty. I have thought about them a lot
> > already. Suspend shouldn't introduce any big surprises.
>
> Suspend isn't introducing the surprises. Fuse is. It creates the potential
> deadlocks simply by existing (this isn't suspend or hibernate specific).
Yes. And fuse is not going away any time soon. Get over it ;)
Miklos
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists