[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <773157.44861.qm@web32603.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 03:18:40 -0700 (PDT)
From: Martin Knoblauch <spamtrap@...bisoft.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Understanding I/O behaviour
>> b) any ideas how to optimize the settings of the /proc/sys/vm/
>> parameters? The documentation is a bit thin here.
>>
>>
>I cant offer any advice there, but is raid-5 really the best choice
>for your needs? I would not choose raid-5 for a system that is
>regularly performing lots of large writes at the same time, dont
>forget that each write can require several reads to recalculate the
>partity.
>
>Does the raid card have much cache ram?
>
192 MB, split 50/50 to read write.
>If you can afford to loose some space raid-10 would probably perform
>better.
RAID5 most likely is not the best solution and I would not use it if
the described use-case was happening all the time. It happens a few
times a day and then things go down when all memory is filled with
page-cache.
And the same also happens when copying large amountd of data from one
NFS mounted FS to another NFS mounted FS. No disk involved there.
Memory fills with page-cache until it reaches a ceeling and then for
some time responsiveness is really really bad.
I am just now playing with the dirty_* stuff. Maybe it helps.
Cheers
Martin
------------------------------------------------------
Martin Knoblauch
email: k n o b i AT knobisoft DOT de
www: http://www.knobisoft.de
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists