[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0707061111050.3737-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 11:13:14 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to
RAM pathway
On Fri, 6 Jul 2007, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Why are you guys working so hard and spending so much energy to try to
> avoid doing the right thing is beyond my understanding...
>
> > It _does_ apply to kernel threads. That's exactly why I wrote above
> > that kernel threads which try to do I/O during a suspend will need
> > extra attention.
>
> Ok none at all if you don't have a freezer.
In answer to both questions: We need the freezer in order to implement
hibernate. Even if we take your advice and stop using the freezer
during suspend, these issues would still remain and would need to be
solved.
Alan Stern
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists