[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <468E8064.6000107@zytor.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2007 10:48:20 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
CC: Geert Uytterhoeven <Geert.Uytterhoeven@...ycom.com>,
Linux Kernel Development <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux/PPC Development <linuxppc-dev@...abs.org>,
Hiroaki Fuse <Hiroaki_Fuse@...scei.sony.co.jp>
Subject: Re: Too verbose compat_ioctl messages?
Andi Kleen wrote:
> "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> writes:
>> For one thing, it looks like we're returning the wrong thing (EINVAL
>> rather than ENOTTY) across the board. This was unfortunately a common
>> misunderstanding with non-tty-related ioctls in the early days of Linux.
>
> ENOTTY is so excessively misnamed that it is actually surprising
> anybody ever got that "right" (for very small values of right i guess)
>
No argument there.
-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists