[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200707062047.10265.bzolnier@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 20:47:10 +0200
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
To: Mark Lord <lkml@....ca>
Cc: Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca>,
Christoph Pleger <Christoph.Pleger@...uni-dortmund.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PATA-disk named sda
On Friday 06 July 2007, Mark Lord wrote:
> Robert Hancock wrote:
> >..
> > Currently the DMA, multi-sector mode, etc. are not controllable with
> > hdparm with libata. libata is designed to use the fastest settings
> > possible by default. In a lot of cases this messing with hdparm was only
> > needed because of stupidity with the old IDE code (like DMA not being
> > automatically enabled if the low-level driver was built modular).
>
> Actually, most of the hdparm flags were put there to help test the IDE
> subsystem and to help debug the much stranger hardware it had to deal with.
>
> "DMA off by default" was a Linus Torvalds request, to help ensure data safety
> with all of the weird and wonderful crap pre-standardization.
Exactly as Mark says.
I just want to add that "DMA off by default" hasn't been a case for a long
time now and since 2.6.21 the config option for "DMA on by default" is also
finally gone (to make a long story short: this was the best way to fix some
bugs while not causing regressions, not to mention that it was defaulting
to Y for years).
Thanks,
Bart
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists