[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070707065712.5abbbe43.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 06:57:12 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Cc: nickpiggin@...oo.com.au, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tony.luck@...el.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Mike.stroya@...com, y-goto@...fujitsu.com,
dmosberger@...il.com, hugh@...itas.com
Subject: Re: [BUGFIX][PATCH] DO flush icache before set_pte() on ia64.
On Fri, 6 Jul 2007 10:32:29 -0700 (PDT)
Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com> wrote:
> I am a bit worried about the performance impact of all this flushing? What
> is the worst case scenario here?
>
IMHO....
When a user set VM_EXEC to their anonymous memory intentionally and
does many page faults.
I myself don't think (file's) page cache flushing is not so heavy work because
PG_arch_1 guarantees that icache flushing occurs just once at the first
read in the system.
Thanks,
-Kame
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists