[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1I6iPL-0003Hj-00@dorka.pomaz.szeredi.hu>
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2007 09:39:15 +0200
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: rjw@...k.pl
CC: nigel@...pend2.net, pavel@....cz, oliver@...kum.org,
miklos@...redi.hu, benh@...nel.crashing.org, mjg59@...f.ucam.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
> > You're missing the point. I'm arguing that a sync from within the freezer
> > should guarantee that there is no data loss.
>
> Well, it should, but it doesn't ...
>
> Moreover, if FUSE implements syncing, then the sync from within the freezer
> will almost certainly deadlock.
Rafael, think positively: by the time fuse implements sync(), the
freezer will be long gone ;)
Miklos
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists