[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070708133539.GA12597@elte.hu>
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 15:35:39 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>
Cc: kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
shaohua.li@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] kvm-scheduler integration
* Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com> wrote:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_KVM
> +static __read_mostly struct sched_kvm_hooks kvm_hooks;
> +#endif
please just add a current->put_vcpu() function pointer instead of this
hooks thing.
> static inline void prepare_task_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *next)
> {
> + unload_kvm_vcpu(current);
> prepare_lock_switch(rq, next);
> prepare_arch_switch(next);
> }
> @@ -1860,6 +1912,7 @@ static inline void finish_task_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
> prev_state = prev->state;
> finish_arch_switch(prev);
> finish_lock_switch(rq, prev);
> + reload_kvm_vcpu(current);
ok, this looks certainly cheap enough from a scheduler POV, and it
cleans up the whole KVM/scheduling interaction quite nicely. (I'd not
bother with tweaking the migration logic, there's enough incentive for
the scheduler to keep tasks from migrating unnecessarily.)
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists