linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 11/20] KVM: SVM: Reliably detect if SVM was disabled by BIOS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4690EA8A.3020705@qumranet.com>
Date:	Sun, 08 Jul 2007 16:45:46 +0300
From:	Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>
To:	Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
CC:	kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/20] KVM: SVM: Reliably detect if SVM was disabled by
 BIOS

Roland Dreier wrote:
> seems like we probably want this for 2.6.22... it fixes a panic that
> I've seen actually reported by several users.  Is there any risk to
> merging it?
>
> i guess getting it into 2.6.22.1 would be OK too.
>   

Well, there were reports of miscompiles with the original patch.  This 
one is hopefully fixed.  I'll wait a day or two and upstream it.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/