[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4690EC47.6060904@qumranet.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2007 16:53:11 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
shaohua.li@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] kvm-scheduler integration
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com> wrote:
>
>
>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_KVM
>>>> +static __read_mostly struct sched_kvm_hooks kvm_hooks;
>>>> +#endif
>>>>
>>> please just add a current->put_vcpu() function pointer instead of
>>> this hooks thing.
>>>
>> Won't that increase task_struct (16 bytes on 64-bit) unnecessarily?
>> The function pointers are common to all virtual machines.
>>
>
> well, this function pointer could then be reused by other virtual
> machines as well, couldnt it?
I don't get this. If we add a couple of members to task_struct, it
can't be reused. The values will be the same across all tasks, but the
memory will be gone (including tasks which aren't virtual machines).
> If the task struct overhead is a problem
> (it really isnt, and it's dependent on CONFIG_KVM) then we could switch
> it around to a notifier-alike mechanism.
>
I'm hoping that CONFIG_KVM will be enabled on most distro kernels, so we
need to optimize for that case as well.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists