[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0707081619090.11049-100000@netrider.rowland.org>
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 16:22:19 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@....com>,
Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...el.suspend2.net>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
On Sun, 8 Jul 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> I'm all for changing this infrastructure, but in an organized way (ie. we
> discuss what to do next, we do that and then we go to the next step) and in
> the order that everyone will be comfortable with.
>
> So, let's finish this thread and start over from discussing what needs to be
> done, how (ie. in what order etc.) we are going to do that and who is going to
> do what. Shall we?
IMO we should start by using the new notifier chain and by implementing
a central "icebox" routine. Then we can forbid device registration
during suspend.
It might also be a good idea to add a freezable keventd-like workqueue
specifically intended for things that need to block during a suspend.
Although maybe this will end up being unnecessary; it's too soon to
tell.
Alan Stern
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists