[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070709144745.029094ae@the-village.bc.nu>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 14:47:45 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: akpm@...l.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] generic_nvram: use inode lock not lock_kernel
The locking is only done for lseek so this isn't a big change. All the
other operations are thrown at the arch specific lower layers for locking
handling without the file pointer being directly exposed.
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@...hat.com>
diff -u --new-file --recursive --exclude-from /usr/src/exclude linux.vanilla-2.6.22-rc6-mm1/drivers/char/generic_nvram.c linux-2.6.22-rc6-mm1/drivers/char/generic_nvram.c
--- linux.vanilla-2.6.22-rc6-mm1/drivers/char/generic_nvram.c 2007-07-02 20:47:23.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.22-rc6-mm1/drivers/char/generic_nvram.c 2007-07-09 12:05:06.786669552 +0100
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
static loff_t nvram_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int origin)
{
- lock_kernel();
+ mutex_lock(&file->f_path.dentry->d_inode->i_mutex);
switch (origin) {
case 1:
offset += file->f_pos;
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
return -EINVAL;
}
file->f_pos = offset;
- unlock_kernel();
+ mutex_unlock(&file->f_path.dentry->d_inode->i_mutex);
return file->f_pos;
}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists