linux-kernel - [PATCH] [DLM] keep dlm from panicing when traversing rsb list in debugfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <11839970101065-git-send-email-swhiteho@redhat.com>
Date:	Mon,  9 Jul 2007 17:02:16 +0100
From:	swhiteho@...hat.com
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	cluster-devel@...hat.com, Josef Bacik <jwhiter@...hat.com>,
	Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] [DLM] keep dlm from panicing when traversing rsb list in debugfs

From: Josef Bacik <jwhiter@...hat.com>

This problem was originally reported against GFS6.1, but the same issue exists
in upstream DLM.  This patch keeps the rsb iterator assigning under the rsbtbl
list lock.  Each time we process an rsb we grab a reference to it to make sure
it is not freed out from underneath us, and then put it when we get the next rsb
in the list or move onto another list.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jwhiter@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>

diff --git a/fs/dlm/debug_fs.c b/fs/dlm/debug_fs.c
index 61ba670..9e27a16 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/debug_fs.c
+++ b/fs/dlm/debug_fs.c
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
 #include <linux/debugfs.h>
 
 #include "dlm_internal.h"
+#include "lock.h"
 
 #define DLM_DEBUG_BUF_LEN 4096
 static char debug_buf[DLM_DEBUG_BUF_LEN];
@@ -166,6 +167,9 @@ static int rsb_iter_next(struct rsb_iter *ri)
 			read_lock(&ls->ls_rsbtbl[i].lock);
 			if (!list_empty(&ls->ls_rsbtbl[i].list)) {
 				ri->next = ls->ls_rsbtbl[i].list.next;
+				ri->rsb = list_entry(ri->next, struct dlm_rsb,
+							res_hashchain);
+				dlm_hold_rsb(ri->rsb);
 				read_unlock(&ls->ls_rsbtbl[i].lock);
 				break;
 			}
@@ -176,6 +180,7 @@ static int rsb_iter_next(struct rsb_iter *ri)
 		if (ri->entry >= ls->ls_rsbtbl_size)
 			return 1;
 	} else {
+		struct dlm_rsb *old = ri->rsb;
 		i = ri->entry;
 		read_lock(&ls->ls_rsbtbl[i].lock);
 		ri->next = ri->next->next;
@@ -184,11 +189,13 @@ static int rsb_iter_next(struct rsb_iter *ri)
 			ri->next = NULL;
 			ri->entry++;
 			read_unlock(&ls->ls_rsbtbl[i].lock);
+			dlm_put_rsb(old);
 			goto top;
                 }
+		ri->rsb = list_entry(ri->next, struct dlm_rsb, res_hashchain);
 		read_unlock(&ls->ls_rsbtbl[i].lock);
+		dlm_put_rsb(old);
 	}
-	ri->rsb = list_entry(ri->next, struct dlm_rsb, res_hashchain);
 
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
1.5.1.2

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/