linux-kernel - Re: Liunx power consumption on laptops -- Enormous progress in the last few months

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 09 Jul 2007 17:42:14 -0400
From:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Cc:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
	Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Liunx power consumption on laptops -- Enormous progress in the last few months

On Fri, 06 Jul 2007 13:02:10 EDT, Dave Jones said:
> On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 09:35:24AM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> 
>  > > Where is the ondemand-fix.patch? I can't find any link to it.
>  > 
>  > just click on it in the graph ;_
>  > 
>  > it's also http://www.linuxpowertop.org/patches/ondemand-fix.patch 
>  > (which is submitted already to the maintainers)
> 
> Should be in cpufreq.git (and thus, -mm) too, waiting for .23 to open up.

Somebody should fix http://ww.linuxpowertop.org/known.php then, it says:

"The kernels ondemand CPU frequency management function currently has a
high-frequency timer that samples to see if the CPU is idle. Intel fixed this
and the patches to the kernel to effectively remove this timer are included in
Linus' tree as of 2.6.22-rc1."

which confused me no end when I was looking at this stuff and wondering why
it was in the -mm tree if Linus already picked it up. :)

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped