lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9264.1184017334@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date:	Mon, 09 Jul 2007 17:42:14 -0400
From:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Cc:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
	Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Liunx power consumption on laptops -- Enormous progress in the last few months

On Fri, 06 Jul 2007 13:02:10 EDT, Dave Jones said:
> On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 09:35:24AM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> 
>  > > Where is the ondemand-fix.patch? I can't find any link to it.
>  > 
>  > just click on it in the graph ;_
>  > 
>  > it's also http://www.linuxpowertop.org/patches/ondemand-fix.patch 
>  > (which is submitted already to the maintainers)
> 
> Should be in cpufreq.git (and thus, -mm) too, waiting for .23 to open up.

Somebody should fix http://ww.linuxpowertop.org/known.php then, it says:

"The kernels ondemand CPU frequency management function currently has a
high-frequency timer that samples to see if the CPU is idle. Intel fixed this
and the patches to the kernel to effectively remove this timer are included in
Linus' tree as of 2.6.22-rc1."

which confused me no end when I was looking at this stuff and wondering why
it was in the -mm tree if Linus already picked it up. :)

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ