[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200707092358.08529.dtor@insightbb.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 23:58:07 -0400
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...ightbb.com>
To: Shem Multinymous <multinymous@...il.com>
Cc: hdaps-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, rlove@...ve.org,
Linux Kernel ML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Michael Riepe <michael@...11.de>,
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@...ian.org>
Subject: Re: [Hdaps-devel] [PATCH] hdaps - switch to using input-polldev
On Monday 09 July 2007 02:06, Shem Multinymous wrote:
> > > > Have 2nd input device's ->open() method call input_open_device() for
> > > > the first one.
> > >
> > > Won't that create an overhead by the redundant, unused notifications?
> >
> > They won't leave input core so nothing really noticeable.
>
> Sounds good, then. It's a bit of a hack, but the benefits are well
> worth it (if we can resolve the scheduling issue).
>
You know, I slept on it and I think I want to move the polldev into
opposite direction - to accomodte devices that need "relaxed" polling
and are ok with polling being a bit irregular and maybe even rounded
to next jiffy or something to better accomodate tickless kernels.
So I guess it would be better to drop my hdaps patch after all.
--
Dmitry
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists