[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46932F5C.20709@yahoo.com.au>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 17:03:56 +1000
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
To: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
CC: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...r.kernel.org, suresh.b.siddha@...el.com,
corey.d.gough@...el.com, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Denis Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>,
Erik Andersen <andersen@...epoet.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 09/10] Remove the SLOB allocator for 2.6.23
Matt Mackall wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 11:58:44AM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
>>Just a fancy way of saying roughly that memory waste will increase as
>>the size of the system increases. But that aspect of it I think is
>>not really a problem for non-tiny systems anyway because the waste
>>tends not to be too bad (and possibly the number of active allocations
>>does not increase O(n) with the size of RAM either).
>
>
> If active allocations doesn't increase O(n) with the size of RAM,
> what's all that RAM for?
>
> If your memory isn't getting used for large VMAs or large amounts of
> page cache, that means it's getting used by task structs,
> radix_tree_nodes, sockets, dentries, inodes, etc.
Yeah you could be right. Actually you most likey _are_ right for many
workloads.
--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists