[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46934DC7.1020104@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 18:13:43 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
To: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>
CC: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Sysfs and suicidal attributes
Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 17:49:37 +0900,
> Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> What I was trying to say was that suicide and murder could be done the
>> same way from the driver's POV or am I misunderstanding?
>
> Do you mean a device unregistering itself from its attribute vs. a
> device unregistering another device from its attribute?
More like "device unregistering itself from its attribute" vs. "whatever
else".
>>> A general immediate disconnect of the buffers (which will be handled in
>>> a second pass) would be great, but doesn't sound easy.
>> I haven't thought too hard about actual implementation but it's pretty
>> specific case. If doing things in generic manner is difficult, there
>> are plenty of shortcuts to choose from, I think.
>
> The "second pass" approach where the store method calls the sysfs core
> or sets a flag or whatever sounds doable, but I'm not sure how general
> we can get. Maybe for all store methods that just trigger an action.
Hmm... I'll give it a shot in a few days.
--
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists