[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200707100524.08771.vapier@gentoo.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 05:24:08 -0400
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ak@...e.de
Subject: Re: [patch] hide cond_syscall behind __KERNEL__ for x86_64
This brings x86_64 into line with all other architectures by only defining
cond_syscall() when __KERNEL__ is defined.
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>
---
diff --git a/include/asm-x86_64/unistd.h b/include/asm-x86_64/unistd.h
index ae1ed05..f5d627c 100644
--- a/include/asm-x86_64/unistd.h
+++ b/include/asm-x86_64/unistd.h
@@ -674,6 +674,7 @@ asmlinkage long sys_rt_sigaction(int sig,
#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
#endif /* __NO_STUBS */
+#ifdef __KERNEL__
/*
* "Conditional" syscalls
*
@@ -681,5 +682,6 @@ asmlinkage long sys_rt_sigaction(int sig,
* but it doesn't work on all toolchains, so we just do it by hand
*/
#define cond_syscall(x) asm(".weak\t" #x "\n\t.set\t" #x ",sys_ni_syscall")
+#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
#endif /* _ASM_X86_64_UNISTD_H_ */
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists