[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4692E111.5000305@yahoo.com.au>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 11:29:53 +1000
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
To: Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com>
CC: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Jeremy Maitin-Shepard <jbms@....edu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Hibernation Redesign
Al Boldi wrote:
> Pavel Machek wrote:
>>In the end, you'll get rid of freezer problems, but will have two
>>kernels to care about, and certainly more conventional design. I do
>>not think I have time to try that (and don't think freezer problems
>>are _that_ bad in the first place), but some interested soul could
>>certainly try it.
>
>
> Who said we need two kernels? You could inline it like Xen, which would give
> you one kernel with two modes: normal and hibernate.
kexec can boot the currently running kernel image. There is no
need for two kernels.
--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists