linux-kernel - Re: utimes() with vfat is problematic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707101836170.11053@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Date:	Tue, 10 Jul 2007 18:38:35 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
To:	Pawel Dziepak <hryssta@...il.com>
cc:	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp
Subject: Re: utimes() with vfat is problematic


On Jul 10 2007 12:18, Pawel Dziepak wrote:
>
> Single UNIX Specification says crealy that to do utimes on a file user
> have to had write permissions or be a file owner.

Linux does check for write permission, but _only_ for time=NULL.
Hence it would be helpful if someone knows the exact SUS text,
or whether this is not explicitly specified in SUS, leaving room
for interpretation.



	Jan
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/