linux-kernel - Re: fallocate-implementation-on-i86-x86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4693C580.2000506@garzik.org>
Date:	Tue, 10 Jul 2007 13:44:32 -0400
From:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Amit Arora <aarora@...ibm.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
	Mark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@...cle.com>,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: fallocate-implementation-on-i86-x86_64-and-powerpc.patch

Andrew Morton wrote:
> So I dropped everything.  Let's start again from scratch.  I'd suggest that
> for now we go with just an i386/x86_64 implementation, let the arch
> maintainers wire things up when that has settled down.


It's my observation that that plan usually works the best.  Arch 
maintainers come along and wire up batches of syscalls when they have a 
chance to glance at the ABI, and catch up with x86[-64].

	Jeff




-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/