| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707101303450.22199@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 13:09:03 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mel Gorman <mel@...net.ie> Subject: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, Andrew Morton wrote: > slub-exploit-page-mobility-to-increase-allocation-order.patch > slub-reduce-antifrag-max-order.patch > > These are slub changes which are dependent on Mel's stuff, and I have a note > here that there were reports of page allocation failures with these. What's > up with that? Those were fixed and all has been well since as far as I know. > Maybe I should just drop the 100-odd marginal-looking MM patches? We're > simply not showing compelling reasons for merging them and quite a lot of them > are stuck in a 90% complete state. As far as I can tell the antifrag patches are stable and are significantly enhancing various aspects of the VM and also make it more reliable. SLUB can use it to increase scalability. MM has been using order 3 allocs via SLUB for months now without a problem. Without the antifrag patches order 1 allocs could cause OOMs. It opens the door for functionality that we wanted for a long time such a memory unplug etc. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists