[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707102306030.10340@anakin>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 23:06:50 +0200 (CEST)
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: avoiding rejects
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> There are many situations where patching the kernel involves adding a new
> item to a list, such as:
>
> - adding a makefile line
> - adding a new #include
> - adding a new Kconfig entry
> - adding a new PCI ID
> - adding a record to feature-removal.txt
> - adding a new sysctl table entry
> - etc
>
> Of course, everyone just sticks the new entry at the end of the existing
> entries. This strategy carefully maximises the opportunity for patch
> rejects and leads to unhappiness.
>
> Most of these lists are unordered anyway, so inserting the new item at a
> randomly-chosen position is a better approach than just appending it.
Really?
#includes should be sorted alphabetically
Lots of other stuff should be sorted numerically/alphabetically
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists